|
Benson Group Increment Theory (BGIT), or Group Increment Theory, uses the experimentally calculated heat of formation for individual groups of atoms to calculate the entire heat of formation for a molecule under investigation. This can be a quick and convenient way to determine theoretical heats of formation without conducting tedious experimentation. The technique was developed by Professor Sidney William Benson of the University of Southern California. Heats of formations are intimately related to bond dissociation energies and thus are important in understanding chemical structure and reactivity.〔Benson, S. W. ''Journal of Chemical Education'' 1965, ''42,'' 502-518〕 Furthermore, although the theory is old, it still is practically useful as one of the best group additivity methods aside from computational methods such as molecular mechanics. However, the BGIT has its limitations, and thus cannot always predict the precise heat of formation. == Origin == Benson and Buss originated the BGIT in a 1958 paper.〔 〕 Within this manuscript, Benson and Buss proposed four approximations: #A Limiting Law for Additivity Rules. #Zero-Order Approximation. Additivity of Atomic Properties #First Order Approximation. Additivity of Bond Properties #Second Order Approximation. Additivity of Group Properties. These approximations account for the atomic, bond, and group contributions to heat capacity (Cp), enthalpy (ΔH°), and entropy (ΔS°). The most important of these approximations to the group increment theory is the Second Order Approximation, because this approximation "leads to the direct method of writing the properties of a compound as the sum of the properties of its group."〔Benson, S. W.; Buss, J. H. ''Journal of Chemical Physics'' 1958, ''29,'' 546-572.〕 The Second Order Approximation accounts for two molecular atoms or structural elements that are within relative proximity to one another (approximately 3-5 Angstroms as proposed in the paper). By using a series of disproportionation reactions of symmetrical and asymmetrical framework, Benson and Buss concluded that neighboring atoms within the disproportionation reaction understudy are not affected by the change. In the symmetrical reaction the cleavage between the CH2 in both reactants leads to one product formation. Though difficult to see, one can see that the neighboring carbons are not changed as the rearrangement occurs. In the asymmetrical reaction the hydroxyl-methyl bond is cleaved and rearranged on the ethyl moiety of the methoxyethane. Clearly the methoxy and hydroxyl rearrangement display clear evidence that the neighboring groups are not affected in the disproportionation reaction. The "disproportionation" reactions that Benson and Buss refer to are termed loosely as "radical disproportionation" reactions.〔International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. "(disproportionation )". Compendium of Chemical Terminology (Accessed December 03, 2008)〕 From this they termed a "group" as a polyvalent atom connected together with its ligands. However, they noted that under all approximations ringed systems and unsaturated centers do not follow additivity rules due to their preservation under disproprotionation reactions. One can understand this as you must break a ring at more than one site to actually undergo a disproportionation reaction. This holds true with double and triple bonds, as you must break them multiple times to break their structure. They concluded that these atoms must be considered as distinct entities. Hence we see Cd and CB groups which take into account these groups as being individual entities. Furthermore, this leaves error for ring strain as we will see in its limitations. From this Benson and Buss concluded that the ΔHf of any saturated hydrocarbon can be precisely calculated due to the only two groups being a methylene () and the terminating methyl group ().〔Souders, M.; Matthews, C. S.; Hurd C. O., ''Ind. & Eng. Chemistry'' 1949, ''41'', 1037-1048.〕 Benson later began to compile actual functional groups from the Second Order Approximation.〔Benson, S. W.; Cruicksh, F. R.; Golden, D. M., et al. ''Chemical Reviews'' 1969, ''69,'' 279-324.〕〔Benson, S. W.; Cohen, N. ''Chemical Reviews'' 1993, ''93'', 2419-2438.〕 Ansylyn and Dougherty explained in simple terms how the group increments, or Benson increments, are derived from experimental calculations.〔Eric V. Anslyn and Dennis A. Dougherty ''Modern Physical Organic Chemistry'' University Science Books, 2006.〕 By calculating the ΔΔHf between extended saturated alkyl chains (which is just the difference between two ΔHf values), as shown in figure 1 to the right, one can approximate the value of the C-(C)2(H)2 group by averaging the ΔΔHf's. Once this is determined, all one needs to do is take the total value of ΔHf subtract the ΔHf caused by the C-(C)2(H)2 group(s), and then divide that number by two (due to two C-(C)(H)3 groups) and you now have the value of the C-(C)(H)3 group. From the knowledge of these two groups, Benson moved forward obtain and list functional groups derived from countless numbers of experimentation from many sources, some of which are displayed below. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Benson group increment theory」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|